Monday, 19 October 2026

ys jagan regrets 2023 ec law, calls for neutral commissioner appointments

YS Jagan Mohan Reddy said on Oct 18 he regrets backing the 2023 Election Commission law, labeling it a mistake and urging neutral appointments to restore confidence.

ys jagan regrets 2023 ec law, calls for neutral commissioner appointments

Former Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy said on Sunday he regrets supporting the 2023 law that altered the appointment process for Election Commissioners. He described the change as a mistake and urged a neutral mechanism to restore confidence in elections.

ys jagan regrets 2023 ec law – why the decision is being questioned

Jagan explained that the current committee for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner now consists of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a Union minister nominated by the Prime Minister. He noted that the Chief Justice of India, who previously sat on the panel, has been removed, giving the ruling party two votes against one from the opposition.

Jagan regrets YSRCP’s backing of 2023 Election Commissioner appointment law

The YSR Congress Party had supported the bill in Parliament, but Jagan said the party now recognises the flaw. He compared the situation to a student being examined by the teacher who also sets the exam, saying an examiner cannot be appointed by a student.

YSR Congress chief expresses regret over 2023 Bill for CEC appointment

He called for reforms that would make the selection of both State and Central Election Commissioners neutral. For state appointments, Jagan suggested a panel comprising the Chief Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and possibly the Chief Justice of the High Court.

Allegations of bias in local body nominations

During nominations for local body elections, Jagan accused the State Election Commission of partiality toward the rival Telugu Desam Party. He said police were summoning YSRCP candidates under "bind‑over" pretences, denying them caste and no‑objection certificates, and allowing TDP workers to gather with weapons near nomination centres without intervention.

He also alleged that police helped TDP supporters enter returning officers' rooms, seize nomination papers and assault YSRCP candidates, while the police remained idle. Jagan cited specific incidents in Punganur, where a YSRCP MP’s convoy was attacked, and in Pulivendula, where police allegedly used lathis and rifle fire against filing candidates.

Calls for neutral appointment process to restore public confidence

Jagan concluded that the current arrangement undermines the Constitution and public trust. He urged the Union government to revise the bill, reinstating the Chief Justice’s role and ensuring that no ruling party can dominate the selection of election officials.

Sources: The News Minute, NDTV, TheWire.in.

Frequently asked questions

What law did Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy say he regrets supporting?
He said he regrets supporting the 2023 law that changed the appointment process for Election Commissioners, moving to a committee chaired by the Prime Minister with the Leader of the Opposition and a Union minister, and removing the Chief Justice of India from the panel.
What changes to the appointment committee does Jagan propose?
Jagan suggested a neutral selection body that would include the Chief Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and possibly the Chief Justice of the High Court for state commissioners, and to restore the Chief Justice of India's participation at the central level.
What allegations did Jagan make about the State Election Commission and police during nominations?
He accused the State Election Commission of bias, claimed police were facilitating TDP workers, failed to intervene when YSRCP candidates were attacked, and allowed intimidation tactics such as denying caste certificates and no‑objection certificates.
How does Jagan describe the impact of the current system on public confidence?
Jagan said the lack of neutrality in the appointment process erodes public confidence in elections and called the present arrangement a flaw that must be reformed to restore trust.
Written by

Akhil Pandey

Akhil Pandey is a Senior Editor responsible for reviewing, refining, and improving editorial content to ensure clarity, accuracy, and readability. His editorial approach focuses…